On 3/23/22 16:55, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> It's particularly impressive that the cost of running with ASAN is *so* much
> lower than valgrind. On my workstation a check-world with
> -fsanitize=alignment,undefined,address takes 3min17s, vs 1min10s or so without
> -fsanitize. Not something to always use, but certainly better than valgrind.
It also catches things that valgrind does not so that's a bonus.
One thing to note, though. I have noticed that when enabling
-fsanitize=undefined and/or -fsanitize=address in combination with
-fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage there is a loss in reported coverage, at
least on gcc 9.3. This may not be very obvious unless coverage is
normally at 100%.
Regards,
-David
