Re: Strange syntax for create/drop index - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Glaesemann
Subject Re: Strange syntax for create/drop index
Date
Msg-id 0D7FD2FC-8B32-44B2-9599-84DD9A81DA03@myrealbox.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange syntax for create/drop index  (Haris Peco <snpe@snpe.co.yu>)
Responses Re: Strange syntax for create/drop index  (Haris Peco <snpe@snpe.co.yu>)
List pgsql-general
On Apr 9, 2006, at 13:33 , Haris Peco wrote:

> create index test.test_name on test.test(name)
>
>   schema prefix in 'create index'
>
> I know that it isn't necessary, because postgreSQL know that index
> is (must be)
>  in table's schema, but this is natural for sql writers

Allowing a schema-qualified name for CREATE INDEX implies that there
is a choice of schema you could choose. By disallowing the schema, it
makes developers aware of the limitation of where the index can be
created. If the schema was allowed, some people would infer that they
can place the index in a schema other than the schema the table
resides in, and they would get bitten when they try to do so.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tony Caduto
Date:
Subject: Re: More PostgreSQL conversion fun
Next
From: Ottavio Campana
Date:
Subject: Re: how to document database