On Apr 11, 2009, at 1:49 PM, Sam Mason wrote:
As others have said; the design of PG is such that it's built to assume
you're always connected to exactly one database. I'd guess this is an
artifact from a long time ago when PG didn't have multiple databases.
--
Sam
http://samason.me.uk/
Yes, I believe that this gets at the heart of some of the issue. I think there is some confusion on both sides. Basically, I was under the impression that PG had some overarching database server to which one could connect without needing to specify a database. While, yes, this might be "unremarkable", it is still an extra constraint for no *obvious* reason. I could understand if it was an *option* based on the need for security, etc., but the strict enforcement of this paradigm seems a bit dated. Perhaps the docs make reference as to why, and I simply haven't come across it yet.
That said, "psql" provides me with what I need for now.
Thanks,
Michael
