Re: PG 11 JIT deform failure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: PG 11 JIT deform failure
Date
Msg-id 0BECEC12-5E7B-464B-80C5-B5938C3EA76C@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 11 JIT deform failure  (didier <did447@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PG 11 JIT deform failure
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On June 13, 2019 11:08:15 AM PDT, didier <did447@gmail.com> wrote:
>Extensions can do it, timescaledb in this case with:
>INSERT INTO ... RETURNING *;
>
>Or replacing the test in llvm_compile_expr with  an Assert in
>slot_compile_deform ?

In that case we ought to never generate a deform expression step - core code doesn't afair. That's only done I'd
there'sactually something to deform. I'm fine with adding an assert tough 

Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: didier
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 11 JIT deform failure
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom table AMs need to include heapam.h because of BulkInsertState