On Jun 2, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Todd A. Cook wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Greg, Tom,
>>> But for most users analyze doesn't really have to run as often as
>>> vacuum. One sequential scan per night doesn't seem like that big
>>> a deal
>>> to me.
>> Clearly you don't have any 0.5 TB databases.
>
> Perhaps something like "ANALYZE FULL"? Then only those who need the
> more precise statistics would pay the cost for a full scan.
Might also be worth adding analyze delay settings, ala
vacuum_cost_delay.
