Alternative to slow SRF in SELECT? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Markur Sens
Subject Alternative to slow SRF in SELECT?
Date
Msg-id 0A480F8C-F037-445B-8545-742BB63234D0@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Alternative to slow SRF in SELECT?
List pgsql-general
I have the following  case

select 
my_srf_func(otherfunc(h))
from (values (‘…’::mytype),
             ‘…’::mytype),
             (‘…’::mytype),
             ‘…’::mytype),
             (‘…’::mytype),)
         as temp(h);


I think it’s obvious what I’m trying to do.

My_srf_func is similar to unnest(array) function.

The problem now is that the result size of this could be around 400-500 elements for every function call of otherfunc(h) so when my_srf_func unnests these I should expect 2K+ items even for this simple case.

It’s also not advised to have SRFs in the SELECT of the query, becuase I do get some unexpected/unintuitive results,
but most importantly it’s way too slow.

Any alternatives on how I could rework the query or the my_srf_func to speed things up, without having too many subqueries?

I guess there should be some kind of pattern there.

If there’s any help, both my_srf_func and otherfunc are coded in PL/Python

Thanks.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "huangning290@yahoo.com"
Date:
Subject: Parallel not working
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Alternative to slow SRF in SELECT?