> i'm about to start working on using dbmirror for a project. i'd say that
in
> its current state, it's not complete, but it can be persuaded to serve in
a
> useful way. it lacks conflict resolution,
Agreed, but it's meant to be one way, so...
> and it currently replicates one
> master to one slave (but can be coached into something more
comprehensive.)
Actually it handles multi-slave easily... that's why there's a "MirrorHost"
table. I'm currently replicating out to two slaves with no modifications.
> it also makes assumptions about the initial states of the databases
> involved replication.
Yes, which makes it a true pain in the ass to bring another slave online.
Greg
