Ok now I know what was going on...
I was using the MACRO PG_GETARG_POINTER(0). From reading the manual on
this page: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/xtypes.html
and combining it with the example above, I made the wrong assumption
that it was calling pg_detoast_datum underneath. I now used the
preprocessor to figure out that it just returns a raw pointer.
So I am switching to the macro PG_GETARG_VARLENA_P(0)... does that seem
correct? The macro expansion appears to be correct, but I would just
apperciate some verification.
Thanks,
Morgan
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-novice-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-novice-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Michael Fuhr
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2005 1:05 PM
To: Morgan Kita
Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-novice@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] UPDATE: pg_dump fails due to invalid memory
request
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:52:44AM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:48:34PM -0700, Morgan Kita wrote:
> > Obviously I will need to do more testing and try to debug,
> > but isn't it odd that I can select the data but not copy from it?
>
> That seems odd to me; maybe Tom or somebody else who knows PostgreSQL
> internals can explain why that might happen.
In tests I see different behavior between SELECT and COPY if the
type's output function doesn't call PG_DETOAST_DATUM on its argument:
SELECT returns the correct data but COPY doesn't. Have you neglected
to call PG_DETOAST_DATUM?
--
Michael Fuhr
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
