Il giorno 27 apr 2017, alle ore 14:31, Pantelis Theodosiou <ypercube@gmail.com> ha scritto:
You seem to think that expressions similar to these should yield the same results:
dateD + intervalA + intervalB
(dateD + intervalA) + intervalB
dateD + (intervalA + intervalB)
But they don't and they couldn't, as many others have mentioned already.
Expressions 1 and 2 are equivalent but the 3rd is not.
And we don't even need leap years to find such "wrong" results. We have leap seconds (which are rare) and leap months (which are pretty common although we don't call them leap months). Just try
Not all months have the same number of days and there is not a way to fix that.
It's just not possible to squeeze 31 days in a 30-days month. What should '2017-03-31'::date + '1 month'::intervalresult and what should'2017-03-30'::date + '1 month'::intervalresult?
Regards, Pantelis
Probably it should be worth it to implement a sort of age2(timestamp, timestamp) function that returns ages accounting for leap years, months, days and seconds, without changing the actual implementation of age(timestamp, timestamp).
