On 30.04.25 13:56, David Rowley wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 at 23:43, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>> memcpy() would make more sense IMO, since the length is
>> known already. I'm fine with either, however.
>
> In case you're looking for inspiration on a standard to follow,
> commits such as 586dd5d6a did seem to favour memcpy() when the length
> was known and only use strlcpy() when it wasn't.
It looks like the memcpy() uses in that commit are for cases where we
don't want/need the null terminator.
I think it's best in general to use str* for strings and mem* for
not-strings. That's easier to read and also better for static analyzers
etc.
