Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Teodor Sigaev
Subject Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes
Date
Msg-id 07465162-72d9-e192-bedb-6e37bca50b56@sigaev.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes
List pgsql-hackers
>> That's the idea that I tried to express. The point is that we need to
>> tell the user that there is no need to worry about it, rather than
>> that they're wrong to ask about it. Though we should probably actually
>> just throw an error.
> 
> Or maybe it should be the collation of the underlying table columns.
> Otherwise the collation returned by an index-only scan would be
> different from a table scan, no?
+1, dangerous
-- 
Teodor Sigaev                      E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                       WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Bugs in TOAST handling, OID assignment and redo recovery