Re: dlgOperator_patch - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Hiroshi Saito
Subject Re: dlgOperator_patch
Date
Msg-id 065f01c37742$a860aa00$1f324d80@w2k
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dlgOperator_patch  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgadmin-hackers
Hi Dave.

From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
(snip)
> >
> > See it, and put it though it hasn't been completed.
> > A problem is still left.
> > It takes a break because it got tired a little.:-)
>
> Hi Hiroshi,
>
> I have applied your patch, and also made some more updates to populate
> the rest of the combo boxes. I think I got it all, though I couldn't see
> where the 'supports merge' chkbox was supposed to be populated from.

Thanks.!

> This is one that is not in pga2 - any ideas?

MERGES is specified tacitly.
Default name in the preparation is put.
I don't think that it is a problem that it doesn't have chkbox.
However, are LTCMP, GTCMP necessary?

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Conrad Vermeulen"
Date:
Subject: Re: indirect dereferencing a field in a record using plpgsql
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgadmin3.chm in CVS