Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
Date
Msg-id 061501c2f8b7$f5280720$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3
List pgsql-performance
Just switch to FreeBSD and use UFS ;)

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffrey D. Brower" <jeff@pointhere.net>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; "eric soroos" <eric-psql@soroos.net>
Cc: "Shankar K" <shan0075@yahoo.com>; <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 4:42 AM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3


> OK so am I hearing:
> 
> XFS is the fastest (but is it the safest?) but does not come on Linux.
> 
> Ext2 does less work than Ext3 so is fastest among what DOES come with
> Linux - but if you have a crash that fsck can't fix you're hosed.
> 
> Ext3 is quite a bit slower if set to be real safe, a wee bit slower if run
> with standard options which makes it more crash-safe, and much slower if the
> mount flags are set to metadata journaling but that is much safer as a file
> system because the metadata journaling is complementary to the PG
> transactioning.
> 
> To determine which you want you must choose which one feels to you like the
> right balance of speed and the setup work you are willing to perform and
> maintain.
> 
> Do I have it right?
> 
>    Jeff
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql performance on Solaris
Next
From: Sean Chittenden
Date:
Subject: Re: ext3 filesystem / linux 7.3