Re: PostgreSQL Benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From greg@turnstep.com
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 05dc8333c30f9e46282486f13f6b968b@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL Benchmarks  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-advocacy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Hrm.  I just saw that the PHP ADODB guy just published a bunch of database
> benchmarks.  It's fairly evident to me that benchmarking PostgreSQL on
> Win32 isn't really fair:
>
> http://php.weblogs.com/oracle_mysql_performance

Is there anyone here that can contact them and get more details about
how the test was run? Even on Windows, I don't beleive that Postgres
should be quite as slow as indicated. I'd rather someone more familiar
with Windows than I take a stab at it.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200302110934

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+SQoFvJuQZxSWSsgRAi5jAJ4li+qUDlxzM1r0XLZAjDlW1oA1ZwCgiOpT
0LgCKy9W5vG0nNcYWNJGkPM=
=Rrw5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Mario Weilguni"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Benchmarks
Next
From: Greg Copeland
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Benchmarks