> On 19 Mar 2023, at 23:41, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:19:56PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote:
>> Rebased to latest Head.
>
> I was looking at this thread, and echoing Daniel's and Alvaro's
> arguments, I don't quite see why this patch is something we need. I
> would recommend to mark it as rejected and move on.
Unless the claimed performance improvement is measured and provides a speedup,
and the loss of zeroing memory is guaranteed safe, there doesn't seem to be
much value provided.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
