Re: Review: listagg aggregate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Date
Msg-id 055A5C3E-A18A-4054-B4D2-0EE3A09611C8@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: listagg aggregate  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Re: Review: listagg aggregate
List pgsql-hackers
On Jan 25, 2010, at 23:14, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> why is concat_agg better than listagg ?

Because it's an aggregate that cocatenates values. It's not an  
aggregate that lists things. I also like concat_agg better than  
string_agg because it's not limited to acting on strings.

Best,

David


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy
Next
From: Alastair Turner
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate