Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date
Msg-id 04e417c8-cd7a-9ed5-e41e-677056b5e9c9@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/03/02 21:48, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>> think we should omit this logic (and change the documentation to
>>> match).  That is, a database-wide ANALYZE should update the statistics
>>> for each child as well as for the parent.  Otherwise direct queries
>>> against the children (and partitionwise joins, once we have that) are
>>> going to go haywire.
>>
>> OK, done.  I updated both analyze.sgml and vacuum.sgml to be more up to
>> date.  Both pages previously omitted materialized views.
>>
>> Attached updated patches.
> 
> Thanks, committed 0001 with a slight change to the wording.

Thanks.  I noticed that 'and' is duplicated in a line added by the commit
to analyze.sgml.  Attached 0001 fixes that.  0002 and 0003 same as the
last version.

Thanks,
Amit

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] snapbuild woes
Next
From: Neha Khatri
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] SortSupport for macaddr type