Re: Bricolage: Impressive - Mailing list pgsql-www

From David Wheeler
Subject Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Date
Msg-id 04EE9700-4B12-11D8-8158-000A95972D84@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bricolage: Impressive  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-www
On Jan 19, 2004, at 12:44 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

> k, seperate VM isn't an issue ... but what is it doing that it needs
> its
> own machine?  God, I thought Java programs were the worst, you are
> saying
> that this needs more then jakarta-tomcat processes?
>
> David?

It typically starts up using around 25MB per process (shared). It's not
uncommon for processes to swell upwards of 50MB or more. Then there are
the PostgreSQL processes.

Hey, you want a lot of functionality, you got to pay for it.

Cheers,

David


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: David Wheeler
Date:
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Next
From: David Wheeler
Date:
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive