> On 14 Apr 2023, at 15:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> I mainly put save_errno back into SOCK_ERRNO for greppability, I don't have any
>> strong opinions either way so I went with the latter suggestion. Attached v3
>> does the above change and passes the tests both with a broken and working
>> system CA pool. Unless objections from those with failing local envs I propose
>> this is pushed to close the open item.
>
> One more question when looking at it with fresh eyes: should the argument
> of X509_verify_cert_error_string be "ecode" or "vcode"?
Good catch, it should be vcode.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
