On 04.09.22 16:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> I guess we could proceed like this:
>
> 1. Invent the --with option. Temporarily make "make check" in ecpg
> print a message but not fail if the option wasn't selected.
>
> 2. Update buildfarm client to recognize the option and skip ecpg-check
> if not selected.
>
> 3. Sometime down the road, after everyone's updated their buildfarm
> animals, flip ecpg "make check" to throw an error reporting that
> ecpg wasn't built.
Why is this being proposed?
