On 2021-01-20 21:08, Alexey Kondratov wrote:
> On 2021-01-20 18:54, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2021-Jan-20, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021-Jan-20, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>
>>> > +/*
>>> > + * This is mostly duplicating ATExecSetTableSpaceNoStorage,
>>> > + * which should maybe be factored out to a library function.
>>> > + */
>>> > Wouldn't it be better to do first the refactoring of 0002 and then
>>> > 0001 so as REINDEX can use the new routine, instead of putting that
>>> > into a comment?
>>>
>>> I think merging 0001 and 0002 into a single commit is a reasonable
>>> approach.
>>
>> ... except it doesn't make a lot of sense to have set_rel_tablespace
>> in
>> either indexcmds.c or index.c. I think tablecmds.c is a better place
>> for it. (I would have thought catalog/storage.c, but that one's not
>> the
>> right abstraction level it seems.)
>>
>
> I did a refactoring of ATExecSetTableSpaceNoStorage() in the 0001. New
> function SetRelTablesapce() is placed into the tablecmds.c. Following
> 0002 gets use of it. Is it close to what you and Michael suggested?
>
Ugh, forgot to attach the patches. Here they are.
--
Alexey
