> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 20 February 2003 14:31
> To: Hannu Krosing
> Cc: Dave Cramer; Peter Eisentraut; Pgsql Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] request for sql3 compliance for the
> update command
>
>
> Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> writes:
> > Are you against it just on grounds of cleanliness and ANSI
> compliance,
> > or do you see more serious problems in letting it in ?
>
> At this point it seems there are two different things being
> tossed about. I originally understood Dave to be asking for
> parens to be allowed around individual target column names,
> which seems a useless frammish to me. What Bruce has pointed
> out is that a syntax that lets you assign multiple columns
> from a single rowsource would be an actual improvement in
> functionality, or at least in convenience and efficiency. (It
> would also be a substantial bit of work, which is why I think
> this isn't what Dave was offering a quick patch to do...)
> What I'd like to know right now is which interpretation
> Informix actually implements.
>
> I don't like adding nonstandard syntaxes that add no
> functionality --- but if Informix has done what Bruce is
> talking about, that's a different matter altogether.
Informix SE allows me to do:
CREATE TABLE djp(col1 INTEGER, col2 INTEGER)
INSERT INTO djp VALUES(1, 2)
UPDATE djp SET(col1, col2) = (3, 4)
However
UPDATE djp SET(col1, col2) = (SELECT col2, col1 FROM djp)
Results in a syntax error. I don't have Informix IDS so I don't know if
that can do it.
Regards, Dave.
