Re: XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report - Mailing list pgsql-cygwin

From Dave Page
Subject Re: XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report
Date
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B83AF03E@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report  (Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>)
List pgsql-cygwin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com]
> Sent: 15 April 2003 21:07
> To: Cygwin
> Cc: Dave Page; Pgsql-Cygwin
> Subject: Re: [CYGWIN] XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report
>
> > Yes, XP Home had (and still has) reported problems.  But, I
> don't have
> > access to XP Home, so I cannot confirm or refute them.
>
> Sorry but I don't quite understand that.  XP Home is the same
> as XP Pro except for the user interface side and some minor
> services. Especially the OS kernel is the same.  No missing
> calls, no different behaviour.  From the Cygwin side of life,
> both are the same.

I thought I heard there were differences in the way you could specify
the user account used by services (specifically you couldn't)? I've
never used Home so may be completely off-track, but as Jason implies,
judging by posts to the pgsql-cygwin list there is definately something
different between home and pro causing the problem on home that don't
exist with pro.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-cygwin by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report
Next
From: "George Weaver"
Date:
Subject: Re: XP Pro cygipc/PostgreSQL test report