Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it towork? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it towork?
Date
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259BBE@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 03 February 2003 14:39
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; Neil Conway; PostgreSQL Hackers
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Interactive Documentation - how do you
> want it towork?
>
>
> "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> > Perhaps we should then prune the garbage out of the old
> version, and
> > make the comments version specific so that we start afresh with the
> > new docs, but leave the useful comments against the older versions?
>
> It seems clear to me that the comments *should* be version
> specific, if that's at all feasible.  When we make a new
> release then we can start with zero comments if that seems
> appropriate --- but as long as an older set of docs remains
> on-line, it should have the comments that were made for it.

Yes, from the various discussions here and elsewhere I think this is
going to be the way to go. I will make the appropriate change now.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Interactive Documentation - how do you want it towork?
Next
From: greg@turnstep.com
Date:
Subject: Re: PGP signing releases