On 2024-11-27 We 7:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 2024-11-26 Tu 8:58 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
>> It might be worth checking if 4517358e and f71007fb should be
>> back-patched too. There was a brief discussion[1], but no one with
>> Windows-testing capabilities was around and it didn't seem too
>> serious, and then there was the whole re-wrap and it seemed best to
>> keep out of the way of that. But now that the coast is clear...
>>
>> [1]
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD5tBcKnE3C1hycBYZYtYpNssQR_e%2Bu2%3DCmDhGRFvDMEg3onRg%40mail.gmail.com
>
>
>
> Yes, it's on my TODO list. Have been waiting for a) the releases to
> settle down b) getting availability of Windows resources again and c)
> being back at my home location. All three are now met, so will work on
> it.
>
>
>
Those patches didn't actually include any tests. I guess the best test
would be to create a chain of several junction points and then run
initdb on the leaf of the chain?
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
