On 24/06/2021 12:01, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> As many will be aware, there is a syntactic ambiguity in the SQL
> standard regarding the keyword UNBOUNDED. Since UNBOUNDED is a
> non-reserved word, it could be the name of a function parameter and be
> used as an expression. There is a grammar hack to resolve such cases as
> the keyword.
>
> I brought this issue to the SQL standard working group, and a fix has
> been agreed. (Since long-standing syntax obviously can't be changed,
> the fix is basically just an additional rule saying, "if you see this,
> it means the keyword".)
Nice!
> While working on that, I wrote a few test cases to explore this and
> check how PostgreSQL actually handles this. I figure these test
> cases are worth committing so that we have a record of this and
> future grammar refactorings can maintain the behavior.
+1
- Heikki
