On 30 Oct 2009, at 21:09, Scott Bailey wrote:
>> My personal feeling is that when you provide any ordering operator
>> and
>> negation you can easily provide an absolute value operator. We've
>> already (somewhat arbitrarily) decided that one of '1month -30days'
>> and
>> '-1month 30days) is "greater" than the other, so why not provide an
>> operator that returns the "greater" of an interval value and its own
>> negation?
>
> Technically, greater doesn't arbitrarily decide one is greater than
> the other. It determines the two are equivalent and (correctly)
> chooses the leftmost one.
>
> I think it is important to separate the concept of an interval with
> addition of an interval with a timestamp. By (the interval type's)
> definition a day is 24 hours, a month is 30 days, a year is 365.25
> days. And the user needs to understand that abs and extract epoch do
> their calculations based on those definitions rather than what would
> happen when applied to an arbitrary timestamp.
There's a slight complication to this approach; what happens if you
ask for <timestamp> + abs(<interval>)?
You don't want to calculate the result of abs() based on a 24h day, a
30d month and a 365.25d year as there is a timestamp to base your
calculations on, but AFAIK you can't see that from within the abs()
function implementation. Unless you store that information in the
context somehow.
Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll see there is no forest.
!DSPAM:737,4aec24e711071499813979!
