Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From YANG Xudong
Subject Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
Date
Msg-id 027dd4bc-77ff-9e6d-6cfe-f07cd995889f@ymatrix.cn
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch native checksum implementation.
List pgsql-hackers
On 2023/8/8 14:38, John Naylor wrote:
> 
> It seems that platforms capable of running Postgres 
> only support 64 bit.

I think so.


>  > So I guess using aligned memory access is necessary and I have updated
>  > the comment in the code.
> 
> Okay, so it's not "necessary" in the sense that it's illegal, so I'm 
> thinking we can just re-use the Arm comment language, as in 0002.

Yes. I think it is similar to Arm.


> v4 0001 is the same as v3, but with a draft commit message. I will 
> squash and commit this week, unless there is additional feedback.

Looks good to me. Thanks for the additional patch.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: cpluspluscheck vs ICU
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect handling of OOM in WAL replay leading to data loss