Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Date
Msg-id 026AD6A1-3396-47F4-B87E-77E3F139D166@iki.fi
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 16 July 2018 21:38:39 EEST, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
>wrote:
>> Doesn't have to be a trigger, could be a CHECK constraint, datatype
>input
>> function, etc. Admittedly, having a datatype input function that
>inserts to
>> the table is worth a "huh?", but I'm feeling very confident that we
>can
>> catch all such cases, and some of them might even be sensible.
>
>Is this sentence missing a "not"?  i.e. "I'm not feeling very
>confident"?

Yes, sorry.

- Heikki


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?
Next
From: Andrey Klychkov
Date:
Subject: Alter index rename concurrently to