Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Rob Sargent
Subject Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Date
Msg-id 024A7C75-C1D5-41CF-B68F-23F418E8379A@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general

> On Apr 15, 2022, at 11:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> writes:
>> The function in question is working but I'm having trouble getting at
>> it's current definition and the possibility that there are more v10->v14
>> issues in this database.  The last ERROR: below seems to me "a system
>> thing"(tm)
>
> Hmm, it looks like \df does not cope well with spaces in the argument
> list:
>
> regression=# \df genome_threshold_mono(text,text,double)
>                       List of functions
> Schema | Name | Result data type | Argument data types | Type
> --------+------+------------------+---------------------+------
> (0 rows)
>
> regression=# \df genome_threshold_mono(text,text, double)
> ERROR:  invalid regular expression: parentheses () not balanced
>
> It's sending the server a bogus pattern in the second case.
> I've not looked at the code yet, but this does seem like a
> psql (not server) bug.
>
> As Adrian noted, you're not supposed to use parameter names
> in \df, only their types.  It seems like whitespace ought
> to be allowed though.
>
>            regards, tom lane
Thank you. Much relieved.

The no-space-no-names thing is suspicious. Away from desk just now but sure I’ve successfully cutpasted the arg list
into\df calls   Will test shortly 


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade