On Thursday 23 May 2002 08:22, you wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-05-23 at 02:01, John Taylor wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 May 2002 03:40, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 16:05, John Taylor wrote:
> > >
> > > > So, how would I merge the data from the view with the data to copy in ?
> > >
> > > ??? Unless I am misunderstanding you:
> >
> > I think you are misunderstanding me.
> > I have 300,000 rows to insert.
> > They each require a different query to obtain the correct data to insert.
>
> Oh, ok. How about creating an intermediary, indexless table
> that the 300,000 records will be inserted into. Then, after
> the intermediary table is populated, drop the index(es) on
> orderlines and INSERT INTO orderlines SELECT * FROM intermediary;
>
That sounds a good idea.
Would it be quicker to copy out from the intermediary, and then copy in to the real one ?
I guess I'll have to experiment.
I have a feeling a lot of the problems may be due to the indexes.
I've been experimenting with an easier table.
copy in to the live takes 5 minutes for 850000 records
copy in to the updates takes 2 hours !
It is the same data with 3 extra columns, but there are an additional 2 indexes.
I think it must be the indexes making the diffrence. I'm just checking now.
Thanks for the ideas !
Regards
JohnT
