Re: sql_implementation_info still contains old value - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Johnston
Subject Re: sql_implementation_info still contains old value
Date
Msg-id 018601cdb305$2f2b07d0$8d811770$@yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sql_implementation_info still contains old value  (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com>)
Responses Re: sql_implementation_info still contains old value  (Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Euler Taveira
> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 6:59 PM
> To: Erik Rijkers
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sql_implementation_info still contains old value
> 
> On 25-10-2012 15:36, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> > I would expect 9.2.1 to contain '09.02.0001' (not '09.02.0000').
> >
> '09.02.0000' is the initdb'ed version. It seems you upgrade binaries from
9.2
> to 9.2.1.
> 
> 
> It seems we should ignore the last digit or invent a way to update that
tuple
> according to the new minor version. Another option is document that that
> version is the initdb'ed version.
> 

If this is the case does pg_upgrade "init-db" for this purpose?

David J.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: sql_implementation_info still contains old value
Next
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: sql_implementation_info still contains old value