Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adam Lang
Subject Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?
Date
Msg-id 016e01c05aff$65473660$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?  ("Brian C. Doyle" <bcdoyle@mindspring.com>)
List pgsql-general
Here is a link that explains memory.  It is from a windows2000 magazine, but
it isn't very NT specific.  It speaks in genaralities.  I thought it was a
rather good atrticle.

http://www.win2000mag.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7290

I don't think you need to be a subscriber to read it.

Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vivek Khera" <khera@kciLink.com>
To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?


> >>>>> "LO" == Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
>
> LO> The 2GB size limits of ia32 come in to play due to byte addressing
> LO> (versus word addressing) in ia32 plus the use of signed single
register
> LO> two's-complement integers.
>
> LO> But, as always, I reserve the right to be wrong.
>
> You are wrong.  The file size limit has to do with the data size of
> your file offset pointer.  This is not necessarily a 32 bit quantity
> on a 32-bit processor.
>
> --
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Vivek Khera, Ph.D.                Khera Communications, Inc.
> Internet: khera@kciLink.com       Rockville, MD       +1-240-453-8497
> AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Martin A. Marques"
Date:
Subject: Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?
Next
From: "Mr. Shannon Aldinger"
Date:
Subject: Re: Can PostGreSQL handle 100 user database?