> On Mar 21, 2022, at 8:41 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
> My first inclination is to say it's probably ok. The immediately obvious
> alternative would be to create yet another set of functions that don't
> have classId parameters. That doesn't seem attractive.
>
> Modulo that issue I think patch 1 is basically ok, but we should fix the
> comments in objectaccess.c. Rather than "It is [the] entrypoint ..." we
> should have something like "Oid variant entrypoint ..." and "Name
> variant entrypoint ...", and also fix the function names in the comments.
Joshua,
Do you care to create a new version of this, perhaps based on the v2-0001 patch I just posted?
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
