The new vacuum comments are much more clear. Bravo.
As for the large objects, I'll have to see what happens when I delete a row
that contains a large object. Sounds like they are not being deleted for me
as I had thought. That's too bad since I know it must be a common problem
for those who use them. I use the JDBC library, so I don't really even
create the large objects except through standard JDBC calls like
PreparedStatement.setBytes(). I'll have to see if JDBC does an unlink
anywhere.
David
