> In my code where I need to store short pieces of binary data (like
> digests) I encode them in hex and store the hex. Yes this results in a
> 2 times increase in storage, and some overhead in encoding/decodeing,
> but it isn't too bad. Sure you could use other encodings for the binary
> data, but I find hex to be the easiest for small amounts of data.
We use base64 which converts every 3 characters into 4 (as I recall) for
such short things. For longer, type oid in sql works with
setBytes()/getBytes() in JDBC2, but what the overhead is for a small amount
of binary data I don't know.
David
