On 14.07.22 12:05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 13.07.22 20:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> What platforms did this fail on? How can one observe the failure
>>> locally?
>>
>> wrasse at least:
>>
>> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=wrasse&dt=2022-07-13%2014%3A49%3A17
>>
>>
>> I think possibly you could duplicate the problem with gcc
>> by using -fkeep-inline-functions, but I've not tried.
>
> Confirmed, -fkeep-inline-functions will catch it. Good to know.
It seems that -fkeep-inline-functions is more demanding than what wrasse
is running on. I need the attached patch to get it to build cleanly.
(The first hunk undoes some parts of
2cd2569c72b8920048e35c31c9be30a6170e1410, but the others are unrelated
and old.)
I think this would be good to apply so that this method of checking
inline functions is available in the future.
