Re: Performance Expectations - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Marc Mitchell
Subject Re: Performance Expectations
Date
Msg-id 006c01c305db$28050460$6701050a@eisolution.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Performance Expectations  ("Derek Hamilton" <derek@capweb.com>)
List pgsql-admin
I would suggest simply doing an EXPLAIN on your query and examining the
output.  It will tell you whether your index is being used or not.  That's
a big first step in determining what your optimal performance expectations
should be.

Marc Mitchell - Senior Application Architect
Enterprise Information Solutions, Inc.
4910 Main Street
Downers Grove, IL 60515
(630) 512-0570
marcm@eisolution.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Derek Hamilton" <derek@capweb.com>
To: <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2003 1:24 PM
Subject: [ADMIN] Performance Expectations


> Hello all,
>
> We're using PostgresQL with a fairly large database (about 2GB).  I have
one
> table that currently exceeds 4.5 million records and will probably grow
to
> well over 5 fairly soon.  The searching of this table is basically done
on
> one field, which field I have set up a btree index on.  My question is,
if I
> search this table and get the results back in about 6-7 seconds is that
> pretty good, not so good...?  What are the things I should look at in
> determining the performance on this?
>
> BTW, forgive the lack of information.  I'd be happy to post more info on
the
> table, hardware, etc.  I just didn't want to overwhelm the initial
question.
>
> Thanks,
> Derek Hamilton
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Biagioni
Date:
Subject: Re: deadlock detection
Next
From: Andrew Biagioni
Date:
Subject: Re: