> > As for locks,weak locks doesn't pass intensive locks. Dba
> > seems to be able to alter a table at any time.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand this sentence. Tom suggested placing a shared
lock on
> any table that is accessed until end of tx. Noone can alter table until
all users have
> closed their txns and not accessed tables again.
More of that - while one xaction will wait to alter a table no new xaction
will be
allowed to access this table too.
> Remember that this would include creating an index ...
I don't think so. Index creation requires
1. share lock on schema
2. share lock on data
Vadim
