Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us > writes:
>I concluded that it probably wasn't a good idea to have the additional
state transition in SIGINT handling. Generally >PM_STARTUP means "we're
running the startup process and nothing else", and that's useful state info
that we shouldn't >throw away lightly.
I tested the patch, it is working fine.
I have a query regarding the changing of pmState only incase of SIGTERM but
not incase of SIGINT.
Is there any reason to handle like this? or Is it ok to modify the handling
of pmState in SIGTERM same as SIGINT?
Regards,
Hari babu.
