Opinion / advice needed for TODO: function params ref by name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gevik Babakhani
Subject Opinion / advice needed for TODO: function params ref by name
Date
Msg-id 001c01c82090$fabae170$0a01a8c0@gevmus
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Opinion / advice needed for TODO: function params ref by name
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

This is about:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-11/msg00028.php

In order to resolve <function name>.<parameter name> the check in 
transformColumnRef goes into case 2 which is A.B

The ideal way to resolve the func.param in this case is to perform the
callback (hook)
after ALL the checks (like qualifiedNameToVar) are performed.

Unfortunately for func.param is this problematic because
qualifiedNameToVar and transformWholeRowRef/ParseFuncOrColumn
internally call RTE functions which justifiably throw an "ambiguous column
error". 

I would like your opinion about the following implementations:

Only when parsing functions and only in case of A.B:

a) Check for func.param before qualifiedNameToVar and transformWholeRowRef/ParseFuncOrColumn 
  result: func.param resolves correctly,  but: in case of a function name/parameter name being the same as        a
tablename / column name, the func.param will be resolved first.        for example:
 
        create table func( id int, fld1 varchar );
        create function func( id int, fld1 varchar ) ... as        $$           select func.id from func where func.id
=func.id;                $$         language sql;
 
        above will produce the unexpected result hence <function
name>.<parameter name>        will be resolved first.

b) step 1. call qualifiedNameToVar with implicitRTEOK = FALSE;   step 2. if no results then perform callback;   step 3.
Nextif no results then    qualifiedNameToVar with
 
implicitRTEOK = TRUE (default);  step 4. if no result then continue as ParseFuncOrColumn 
  result: func.param resolves correctly  but: the order will be qualifiedNameToVar , CallBack , ParseFuncOrColumn. 
I have tested both options (a) and (b)  
Current regression test + new tests pass on Win and RH.

Any thoughts?

Regards,
Gevik.

------------------------------------------------
Gevik Babakhani

PostgreSQL NL       http://www.postgresql.nl
TrueSoftware BV     http://www.truesoftware.nl
------------------------------------------------



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Weird type selection choice
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Opinion / advice needed for TODO: function params ref by name