"David Lloyd-Jones" <david.lloyd-jones@netcom.ca> wrote:
> How can this be? Isn't this a contradiction of some sort?
Contradiction. so what else is new?
But while I'm at it, I wonder if anybody knows why directories are named
"rc.d" and "init.d"?
Init seems clear enough, and rc might be resource, I suppose. What's the .d,
or what happened to a, b, and c?
-dlj.