Re: Index on integer or on string field - Mailing list pgsql-general

From FarjadFarid\(ChkNet\)
Subject Re: Index on integer or on string field
Date
Msg-id 001401d08fd4$5dc6c210$19544630$@checknetworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Index on integer or on string field  (Job <Job@colliniconsulting.it>)
List pgsql-general
Hi,

My approach would be to improve the uniqueness of each record/row. Otherwise
you'll have to traverse the entire table for every query. At 100/200 queries
per second you are asking for trouble on several fronts. Including crashing
your hard disk faster than need be.

Hope this helps. Good luck.

Best Regards


Farjad Farid


-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Job
Sent: 15 May 2015 16:19
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] Index on integer or on string field

Hello,

i have a table of about 10 millions of records, with the index on a string
field.
Actually is alphabetical; since queries are about 100/200 per seconds, i was
looking for a better way to improve performance and reduce workload.

The unique values, of that fields, are about the 50 (category name), and we
could create a second table to codify, with numerical integer values, the 50
recurring names.

Is index are integer and not characteral, performance are better and
workload reduces?

Is there any comparisons?

Thank you!
Francesco

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make
changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade failing from 9.3 to 9.4 because "template0" already exists
Next
From: Daniel Begin
Date:
Subject: Re: Restarting DB after moving to another drive