Re: two versions on same linux - Mailing list pgsql-admin
From | Paul Gimpelj |
---|---|
Subject | Re: two versions on same linux |
Date | |
Msg-id | 000901c44114$d58aa0c0$3410fea9@zoom Whole thread Raw |
In response to | two versions on same linux ("Paul Gimpelj" <pgimpelj@sympatico.ca>) |
List | pgsql-admin |
thanks, I used tar.gz version, now trying to get regression working. I want two simo servers. Any suggestions on port numbers? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne@acm.org> To: <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 8:19 AM Subject: Re: [ADMIN] two versions on same linux > A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, pgimpelj@sympatico.ca ("Paul Gimpelj") wrote: > > I have redhat 7.3 and postgres 7.2 > > > > Is there a way to have 7.4 installed together with postgres 7.2 ? and both running at the same time, > > > > with of course different data directories. > > > > should i use the generic postgres or the rpm'd. > > Presumably the respective RPMs will conflict between the different > versions, which is a bit of a problem. > > You could of course install one or the other or even both from source, > as long as you choose a specific place to stick them. > > Under the circumstances, I'd be inclined to do this: > > - Install the PG 7.4 RPMs, in order to have things like Perl support > managed by the package management system. > > Personally, I'd rather stick hot needles in my eyes (add further > gruesome details as needed ;-)) than manage Perl stuff by hand. > > - Install PG 7.2 AND 7.4 in source code form in some place that YOU > manage, and run the database clusters out of that. > > A naming convention could be to stick them in /opt; you'd configure > the source builds something like: > > %postgresql-7.2.5> ./configure --prefix=/opt/postgres/7.2.5 > [then build and install 7.2.5] > > %postgresql-7.4.2> ./configure --prefix=/opt/postgres/7.4.2 > [then build and install 7.4.2] > > You'd need to customize both "init" scripts in /etc/rc.d, perhaps > basing them on the ones provided by the RPM file. > > > The existing redhat has no passwords for postgres, and even if if > > assign one to user postgres, > > > > postgres ignores it. > > That's probably based on the ACLs configured in the pg_hba.conf file; > if there are "trust" entries there, passwords can get ignored... > -- > (reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.mca" "@" "enworbbc")) > http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/emacs.html > "We live in a Newtonian world of Einsteinian physics ruled by > Frankenstein logic." -- David Russell > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
pgsql-admin by date: