Re: Testing for a record before update or insert without using a function. - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Chris White (cjwhite)
Subject Re: Testing for a record before update or insert without using a function.
Date
Msg-id 000401c37e06$85630af0$5c976b80@amer.cisco.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Testing for a record before update or insert without using a function.  ("Geoff Ellis" <geoff@metalogicplc.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Why not try doing the update and if that fails i.e. returns a value of 0
(no row updated), then do the insert. Thus if your high runner case is
that the entry exists, then you are going to bypass having to test if
the entry exists.

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Ellis
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:41 AM
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: [ADMIN] Testing for a record before update or insert without
using a function.


Is it possible to test if a record exists in a table and then if it does
do an update on that table or if it doesn't do an insert ? I've looked
around the documents and it seems everything points towards a function?

Is this the only way or has someone done this before.....

TIA

Geoff


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] How to force an Index ?
Next
From: "Ravi T Ramachandra"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql UPDATE LOCKS unrelated rows.