Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

8 July 2015

• 05:05   Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Graeme B. Bell
• 06:06   Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Craig James
• 08:31   Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Joshua D. Drake
• 10:43   Re: wildcard text filter switched to boolean column, performance is way worse Marc Mamin
• 14:07   Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Graeme B. Bell
• 14:13   Re: Hmmm... why does pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Graeme B. Bell
• 14:20   Re: Hmmm... why does pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Andres Freund
• 20:48   Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Craig James
• 20:52   Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Joshua D. Drake
• 21:09   Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Craig James
• 21:47   Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Merlin Moncure
• 23:27   Re: Hmmm... why does CPU-intensive pl/pgsql code parallelise so badly when queries parallelise fine? Anyone else seen this? Andres Freund