Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

10 October 2012

• 00:19   Re: Why am I getting great/terrible estimates with these CTE queries? Tomas Vondra
• 07:12   shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 07:19   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 07:32   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Tomas Vondra
• 07:40   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Albe Laurenz
• 08:11   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Julien Cigar
• 08:30   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 08:52   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Julien Cigar
• 11:34   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 12:38   Re: Ways to speed up ts_rank François Beausoleil
• 12:52   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Shaun Thomas
• 13:10   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Shaun Thomas
• 14:36   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 14:38   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Shaun Thomas
• 14:46   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Claudio Freire
• 14:50   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 14:54   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Shaun Thomas
• 14:59   Re: Ways to speed up ts_rank Oleg Bartunov
• 15:46   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Bruce Momjian
• 16:05   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Bruce Momjian
• 16:09   hash aggregation Korisk
• 16:10   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Bruce Momjian
• 17:05   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Claudio Freire
• 17:06   Drawbacks of create index where is not null ? Franck Routier
• 17:28   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Craig James
• 17:56   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Bruce Momjian
• 18:08   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Claudio Freire
• 18:18   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Shaun Thomas
• 18:24   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Claudio Freire
• 18:31   Re: Ways to speed up ts_rank Shane Hathaway
• 18:38   Re: Ways to speed up ts_rank Shane Hathaway
• 19:30   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Jeff Janes
• 20:13   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 20:48   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Claudio Freire
• 21:03   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Bruce Momjian
• 21:30   Re: hash aggregation Sergey Konoplev
• 22:06   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Ondrej Ivanič
• 22:14   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Claudio Freire
• 22:33   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Jeff Janes
• 22:37   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Claudio Freire