Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

10 October 2012

• 00:24   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Jeff Janes
• 00:43   Ways to speed up ts_rank Shane Hathaway
• 00:47   Re: Scaling 10 million records in PostgreSQL table Samuel Gendler
• 00:49   Re: Scaling 10 million records in PostgreSQL table Daniel Farina
• 01:21   Why am I getting great/terrible estimates with these CTE queries? Tomas Vondra
• 02:09   Re: Why am I getting great/terrible estimates with these CTE queries? Tom Lane
• 02:30   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Craig James
• 03:19   Re: Why am I getting great/terrible estimates with these CTE queries? Tomas Vondra
• 10:12   shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 10:19   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 10:32   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Tomas Vondra
• 10:40   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Albe Laurenz
• 11:11   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Julien Cigar
• 11:30   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 11:52   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Julien Cigar
• 14:34   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 15:38   Re: Ways to speed up ts_rank François Beausoleil
• 15:52   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Shaun Thomas
• 16:10   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Shaun Thomas
• 17:36   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 17:38   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Shaun Thomas
• 17:46   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Claudio Freire
• 17:50   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 17:54   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Shaun Thomas
• 17:59   Re: Ways to speed up ts_rank Oleg Bartunov
• 18:46   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Bruce Momjian
• 19:05   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Bruce Momjian
• 19:09   hash aggregation Korisk
• 19:10   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Bruce Momjian
• 20:05   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Claudio Freire
• 20:06   Drawbacks of create index where is not null ? Franck Routier
• 20:28   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Craig James
• 20:56   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Bruce Momjian
• 21:08   Re: Hyperthreading (was: Two identical systems, radically different performance) Claudio Freire
• 21:18   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Shaun Thomas
• 21:24   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Claudio Freire
• 21:31   Re: Ways to speed up ts_rank Shane Hathaway
• 21:38   Re: Ways to speed up ts_rank Shane Hathaway
• 22:30   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Jeff Janes
• 23:13   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Strahinja Kustudić
• 23:48   Re: shared_buffers/effective_cache_size on 96GB server Claudio Freire