Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

13 October 2010

• 00:00   Re: Slow count(*) again... Dan Harris
• 00:23   Re: Query much faster with enable_seqscan=0 Ogden
• 02:29   Re: Query much faster with enable_seqscan=0 Samuel Gendler
• 03:23   Re: How does PG know if data is in memory? Ron Mayer
• 06:40   Re: How does PG know if data is in memory? Robert Haas
• 06:45   Re: Slow count(*) again... Robert Haas
• 06:47   Re: Slow count(*) again... Neil Whelchel
• 07:19   Re: Slow count(*) again... Mark Kirkwood
• 07:40   SQL functions vs. PL/PgSQL functions Reuven M. Lerner
• 07:46   Re: Slow count(*) again... Pierre C
• 08:12   Re: SQL functions vs. PL/PgSQL functions Craig Ringer
• 08:38   Re: Slow count(*) again... Neil Whelchel
• 08:42   Re: Slow count(*) again... Mladen Gogala
• 08:44   Re: Slow count(*) again... Mladen Gogala
• 08:50   Re: Slow count(*) again... Mark Kirkwood
• 10:16   Re: Slow count(*) again... Neil Whelchel
• 10:41   Re: Slow count(*) again... Vitalii Tymchyshyn
• 10:54   Re: Slow count(*) again... Vitalii Tymchyshyn
• 11:42   Re: Slow count(*) again... Craig Ringer
• 12:12   Re: Slow count(*) again... Greg Smith
• 12:34   Re: Slow count(*) again... Mladen Gogala
• 13:02   Re: Slow count(*) again... Greg Smith
• 13:27   Re: Slow count(*) again... Robert Haas
• 13:29   Re: Slow count(*) again... Robert Haas
• 13:45   Re: Slow count(*) again... Kevin Grittner
• 13:49   Re: Slow count(*) again... Tom Lane
• 13:50   Re: SQL functions vs. PL/PgSQL functions Merlin Moncure
• 14:14   Re: SQL functions vs. PL/PgSQL functions Tom Lane
• 17:16   Bogus startup cost for WindowAgg Ants Aasma
• 21:48   Re: Slow count(*) again... Jesper Krogh
• 23:59   Re: Slow count(*) again... Alex Hunsaker