Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

26 March 2010

• 00:28   Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB Tadipathri Raghu
• 00:56   Re: Performance Tuning Large PL/PGSQL Stored Procedure Eliot Gable
• 01:49   good effective_io_concurrency for FusionIO drives? Richard Yen
• 09:08   Re: Performance Tuning Large PL/PGSQL Stored Procedure Merlin Moncure
• 09:18   Re: Performance Tuning Large PL/PGSQL Stored Procedure Richard Huxton
• 10:49   Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB Pierre C
• 11:00   Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB Scott Marlowe
• 20:57   why does swap not recover? Richard Yen
• 21:06   Re: why does swap not recover? Scott Marlowe
• 21:07   Re: pg_dump far too slow Scott Carey
• 21:28   Re: Block at a time ... Scott Carey
• 21:29   Re: why does swap not recover? Scott Carey
• 21:32   Re: why does swap not recover? Craig James