Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

27 December 2007

• 02:34   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Shane Ambler
• 03:11   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Greg Smith
• 03:39   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Mark Mielke
• 05:10   Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Tom Lane
• 06:16   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Shane Ambler
• 06:40   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Shane Ambler
• 07:41   Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Guillaume Smet
• 07:48   Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Magnus Hagander
• 12:15   Re: pg_dump performance Gregory Stark
• 12:20   Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Alvaro Herrera
• 12:50   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Bill Moran
• 13:53   Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Gregory Stark
• 13:59   Re: pg_dump performance Jared Mauch
• 14:27   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Mark Mielke
• 14:54   Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Greg Smith
• 15:20   Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Tom Lane
• 15:36   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Jean-David Beyer
• 15:46   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Vivek Khera
• 15:48   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Vivek Khera
• 16:01   Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Gregory Stark
• 16:05   Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10 Bill Moran
• 17:31   Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Alvaro Herrera
• 17:54   Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances Tom Lane